Teaching Summary Podcasts

Why Your Solid Self Is An Illusion — Geshe Dhawa Gyaltsen

Play Episode Pause Episode

Mute/Unmute Episode Rewind 10 Seconds 1x Fast Forward 30 seconds

00:00 /

RSS Feed

Share

Link

Embed

A teaching summary podcast of Heart Sutra 1996 by Geshe Dhawa Gyaltsen, recorded at Buddha House, Adelaide.

Heart Sutra 1996

Teacher: Geshe Dhawa Gyaltsen
Tradition: Gelug school of Tibetan Buddhism
Venue: Buddha House, Adelaide
Recordings: 11 teaching sessions (1996)
Source: Corrected transcripts from the Bodhi Archive

Overview

In this series of eleven teachings, Geshe Dhawa Gyaltsen provides a detailed commentary on the Heart Sutra (Prajnaparamita Hridaya), the condensed essence of all the Buddha’s eighty-four thousand sets of teachings on the perfection of wisdom. He follows the commentary by Panchen Losang Palden, explaining the text’s structure, its place within the broader Prajnaparamita literature, and — most substantially — how a beginner should approach the practice of meditating on emptiness.

The series moves from the benefits of realising emptiness and the qualities needed in both teacher and student, through a systematic explanation of the Heart Sutra’s key passages (“form is empty, emptiness is form”), to the practical logical analysis a beginner can use to investigate the nature of the self. Geshe Dhawa devotes the central sessions to the four-point analysis of being “free of being one and free of being many” — the logical reasoning considered easiest for beginners. He explains how to identify the object of negation (the innate self-grasping), how to establish the logical possibilities, and how to investigate whether the self is truly one with or truly different from the aggregates.

Geshe Dhawa is careful throughout to distinguish the Prasangika Madhyamika view from the lower Buddhist tenet systems. He repeatedly warns against the two principal dangers in emptiness meditation: falling into the extreme of nihilism (thinking nothing exists at all) and falling into the extreme of eternalism (thinking things exist inherently from their own side). He concludes by relating the stages of emptiness practice to the five paths of the Bodhisattva and briefly explaining the Heart Sutra’s mantra section, emphasising that all this practice must be grounded in Bodhicitta and the accumulation of merit.

Key Teachings

The Heart Sutra: Structure and Background

Geshe Dhawa explains that the Heart Sutra was taught through the blessings of the Buddha’s mind. While the Buddha himself was absorbed in the concentration called “the profound illumination” (meditating on emptiness), his blessings caused Avalokiteshvara to engage in the profound practice of the perfection of wisdom, and Shariputra to ask the question about how to practise.

The sutra opens with four perfect circumstances:
1. The right time: “Thus have I heard at one time”
2. The right teacher: The Bhagavan (Buddha) at Rajgir, Vulture Peak Mountain
3. The right assembly: Great assemblies of Bodhisattvas and monks, including the eight close disciples
4. The right place: Rajagriha (Rajgir)

Geshe Dhawa explains that the actual Heart Sutra begins not with this common background but with the question-and-answer section between Shariputra and Avalokiteshvara.

He notes that the Sanskrit title is preserved at the beginning of all Tibetan translations for three reasons: to leave imprints of the Sanskrit language (since all thousand Buddhas will teach in Sanskrit), to receive blessings, and to show the text’s authentic Indian origin.

The Four Perfections of Wisdom

The “perfection of wisdom” (Prajnaparamita) can be understood in four ways:
1. The scriptural perfection: The texts and treatises that explain emptiness
2. The path perfection: The wisdom realising emptiness — specifically the path that directly cognises emptiness
3. The natural perfection: Emptiness itself — the emptiness of inherent existence
4. The resultant perfection: The two Dharmakayas (truth body and nature body) of a Buddha

To achieve the result (the two Kayas), one must rely on the text, develop the path of wisdom, and realise the nature of emptiness.

Benefits of Realising Emptiness

Drawing on the Mahamudra teachings and the Four Hundred Stanzas of Aryadeva, Geshe Dhawa explains that:
– Emptiness meditation is the best practice for achieving full enlightenment
– In order to overcome ignorance (the root of samsara), one must understand the Prasangika Madhyamika view
– Even a slight doubt tending toward the fact of emptiness has the power to uproot the causes of samsara, like a burned seed that can never produce a sprout
– Those with little merit never even get the chance to think about emptiness
– Lama Tsongkhapa taught that all problems in the world are caused by ignorance of self-grasping, and that even Bodhicitta alone (without understanding dependent arising) cannot liberate one from samsara

The Prasangika Madhyamika View

Geshe Dhawa identifies the Prasangika Madhyamika view as the final or ultimate view, which he also calls the Great Seal (Mahamudra) from the Sutric perspective. He explains:

• Sutrically: Mahamudra is meditation on emptiness as taught by Nagarjuna. The objective Mahamudra (emptiness itself) is the same in both Sutra and Tantra; the difference lies in the subjective side (the mind that cognises it).
• Tantrically: The practice of Mahamudra additionally requires tantric initiation, keeping commitments, the generation stage practice, and the entering, abiding, and dissolving of wind-energies into the central channel to generate the great bliss that cognises emptiness.

The view is described as “free of eight extremes”: no inherently existing arising, no inherently existing cessation, no inherent eternalism, no inherent nihilism, no inherent coming, no inherent going, no inherent oneness, no inherent difference. These can also be summarised as free of four extremes: existence, non-existence, both, and neither.

Suitable Disciples for Emptiness Teachings

Geshe Dhawa explains, following Chandrakirti’s Madhyamakavatara, that the ideal disciple for emptiness teachings should show external signs upon hearing the teachings: the body hairs standing on end and tears of joy. However, since such disciples are rare, at minimum a disciple should be free from two faults:
1. Abandoning the profound view through lack of interest
2. Falling into nihilism through logical analysis — coming to deny the law of cause and effect

From the teacher’s side, anyone who teaches emptiness without personal experience breaks one of the root Bodhisattva vows. Geshe Dhawa humbly notes that he himself does not have direct realisation but has studied for a long time and possesses what he calls “doubt tending toward the fact.”

“Form Is Empty, Emptiness Is Form”

Geshe Dhawa calls this passage “one with four profundities” and explains each line:

1. “Form is empty”: Form does not exist from its own side. It exists only through name and imputation. This does not mean form does not exist at all.

2. “Emptiness is form”: The non-truly-existing nature within that form — that is the emptiness. The lower tenet schools believe something exists on the object’s side; the Prasangika view negates this.

3. “Emptiness is no other than form”: Emptiness and form have the same nature but different names. They are the same entity but different — form is the conventional truth and its emptiness of inherent existence is the ultimate truth.

4. “Form is no other than emptiness”: The object that appears to our eye consciousness, being empty of inherent existence, demonstrates that conventional and ultimate truth are of one nature.

The Four-Point Analysis: Free of Being One, Free of Being Many

This is the principal analytical meditation that Geshe Dhawa teaches for beginners, explained across Sessions 5-10:

Point 1 — Ascertaining the object to be negated:
The self that is to be refuted is not just any self but specifically the innate self-grasping — the self that appears to exist solidly, vividly, and independently within the collection of aggregates without depending on causes and conditions or on mere labelling. Geshe Dhawa uses the analogy of archery: without knowing the target, one cannot shoot the arrow. He distinguishes three levels of self:
– The self as understood by those who have realised emptiness (who still have the appearance of self but know it is not inherently existent)
– The merely labelled self of ordinary beings not influenced by philosophical tenets (the valid, conventional self that goes from life to life)
– The self held to be inherently existent by innate self-grasping (the object to be refuted)

To help students recognise this innate self, Geshe Dhawa suggests observing what happens when one is falsely accused of stealing: at that moment, the self appears vividly as something solid and clear within the body, unable to tolerate the accusation. That is the self to be refuted.

Point 2 — Establishing the logical possibilities:
If the innate self exists inherently, it must exist in one of only two ways: it must be inherently one with the aggregates, or inherently separate from them. There is no third possibility. If it is found to be neither, then it does not exist inherently.

Point 3 — Free of being inherently one with the aggregates:
If the self and the aggregates were truly one:
– They should appear identical to the mind, with no difference between them — but we speak of “my body” and “my mind” as if the self possesses them
– Saying “my aggregates” would be like saying “aggregate aggregate” — the possessor and the possessed would collapse into one
– If the person and body were one, then when the body is cremated and becomes ashes, the self would also become ashes — and there would be no self to take rebirth
– Practising virtue and avoiding non-virtue would become pointless if the self ceased with the body
– Because there are five aggregates, there would have to be five selves; or because each being has one self, there would be only one aggregate
– If the self were one with the aggregate of consciousness, then everything experienced by the body (cold, hunger, thirst) should also be experienced by consciousness in the same way

Point 4 — Free of being inherently many (different from the aggregates):
If the self were inherently separate from the aggregates:
– One should be able to find the self after removing all the aggregates one by one — like removing animals from a group and still finding one remaining. But this is not possible.
– The self should have its own characteristics independent of the body’s characteristics (birth, aging, death) — but the self has no such independent features
– One cannot point to a self where there is no aggregate
– If completely separate, the karma one performs would dissipate (not be experienced by the self) and karma one never performed would ripen upon one

Conclusion:
When one reaches the conviction through personal analysis that the innate self is neither truly one with nor truly separate from the aggregates, one has found the view. The experience is described as a “clear empty appearance” — like space free of obstruction. This is the space-like concentration on emptiness.

Two Types of Meditation on Emptiness

1. Space-like concentration: After negating the object to be negated, one rests in the clear empty appearance — emptiness experienced like space free of all obstruction. This is not the same as simply making the mind blank or empty.

2. Illusion-like meditation: The post-meditative awareness in which phenomena appear but are understood to be like illusions — appearing one way but existing another.

Geshe Dhawa warns that simply doing breathing meditation and bringing the mind to an empty state is not meditation on emptiness. True emptiness meditation requires having negated a specific object through analysis and then experiencing the clear emptiness that results.

The Five Paths and the Heart Sutra

Geshe Dhawa briefly maps the Heart Sutra’s content onto the five Bodhisattva paths:
– Path of accumulation: Analysing emptiness through wisdom arising from hearing and contemplating — this is the stage of the beginner’s four-point analysis
– Path of preparation: Practising emptiness through both analysis and meditation (the line “form is no other than emptiness, emptiness is no other than form”)
– Path of seeing: Direct realisation of emptiness (the passages beginning “in emptiness there is no form, no feeling…”)
– Path of meditation: Deepening familiarisation with the realisation
– Path of no more learning: The resultant stage

The Heart Sutra’s answer to Shariputra’s question is given in two parts: for those of lower intelligence (who practise through the five paths) and for those of sharp intelligence (who practise through mantras).

Necessary Conditions for Realising Emptiness

Geshe Dhawa emphasises that realising emptiness requires many causes and conditions:
– Purely maintaining the practice of morality
– Practising generosity, compassion, and patience
– Dedicating all accumulated merit toward full enlightenment
– Respecting all beings, especially Bodhisattvas
– Both the collection of merit and the collection of wisdom are needed — like two wings of a bird

Even if one does not achieve direct realisation, aspiring to understand emptiness, studying the teachings, and dedicating even a small amount of merit toward it ensures one will be reborn in circumstances where one can hear the teachings on emptiness.

For Hinayana followers who realise emptiness, they stay in meditation for many years. For Mahayana followers, they set a defined period for meditation and then actively benefit sentient beings — because remaining in meditation indefinitely would neglect the work of helping others.

Key Terms

Practice Points

• Identify the target before shooting the arrow: Before attempting to meditate on emptiness, one must first clearly identify the object to be negated — the innate self that appears to exist solidly and independently. Without knowing what you are looking for, logical analysis cannot find it.

• Observe yourself when falsely accused: The innate self becomes most obvious at moments of strong emotion — especially when falsely accused of something one did not do. At that moment, a vivid, solid self appears within the body. That is the self to refute.

• Analyse with one part of the mind while watching with another: Like two friends walking together where one watches the path and the other watches the companion, keep one part of your mind analysing the self while another observes how the self appears and reacts. If you analyse too forcefully, the innate self will hide.

• Do not confuse blank mind with emptiness: Making the mind empty or blank through breathing meditation is not meditation on emptiness. Genuine emptiness meditation results from negating a specific object (the inherently existing self) through analysis and then resting in the resulting clear, empty appearance.

• Do not fall into nihilism: When you analyse and cannot find the self anywhere in the aggregates, do not conclude that nothing exists at all. Not finding the vase is not the same as the emptiness of the vase. The self exists as a mere label on the aggregates; it functions, wakes up, drives, and sleeps — it simply does not exist inherently.

• Use the seed analogy: If a seed existed from its own nature, it would remain a seed forever and could never become a sprout. The fact that it changes into a tree shows it does not exist inherently. Similarly, if a person existed inherently, they would be that person from birth without needing to be named, and would never change.

• Trust your own experience over others’ words: When you have analysed how the self appears and have your own experience of its emptiness, hold to that experience. Even if others give different explanations, your personal analytical experience should remain firm. Just hearing an explanation from someone else is not sufficient because the understanding may change next time you hear a different explanation.

• Both wings are needed: Practising only Bodhicitta (conventional practice) or only emptiness (ultimate practice) is insufficient. Like a bird that needs two wings to fly, one must develop both the collection of merit and the collection of wisdom together.

• Even doubt is valuable: If one cannot gain a direct realisation of emptiness, having a doubt that “tends toward the fact” is already valuable and plants the seeds for future understanding. One should not feel discouraged.

• Be free of two faults when listening: Do not abandon the profound view through lack of interest (thinking “this is too difficult, it is not for me”). And do not, through excessive analysis, come to deny cause and effect (thinking “since nothing exists inherently, karma does not exist”). Both are dangerous extremes.